Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

DataBank: Journal Level Metrics: Journal Citation Reports


Find or create tables consisting of:

  • Impact Factor—the ratio of the number of citations in the previous two years of the journal divided by the number of articles in those years = the average number of recent citations per article.  Check against the library catalog both those journals identified as important, with the highest impact factors, as well as those journals with the weakest impact.  See the H-Index, under Web of Science, as a companion or alternative to the Impact Factor.
  • Immediacy Index—the number of citations that year to articles published during the same year.
  • Cited Half-Life—the median age of articles in the journal that were cited by other journals during the year.
  • Journal Citing Half-Life—the median age of the articles that are cited by the articles published in that same year.
  • Number of articles published in a given year or span of years.
  • How often articles in a journal refer to articles previously published in that journal.
  • How often articles in a journal refer to articles previously published in other journals.
  • Number of citations from articles published in a journal in a given year or span of years to that journal and other journals.
  • The frequency with which articles published in a journal during each of the most recent ten years were cited by specific journals during the year.
  • The most frequented cited journals.
  • Citation and article counts, which measure the frequency of which scholars use individual journals.
  • The largest journals in a subfield.


  • almost all of the journals are in English
  • and are published in Western Europe and the U.S.
  • not all areas of study—especially within the humanities and social sciences—are represented,
  • while others are under-represented in terms of their journals
  • working papers are not included
  • data is included from journals that publish original research as well as from review journals' review articles, each of which have very different citation patterns and behavior
  • negative citations give false weight to the measurement of impact
  • and citations from books are generally absent.

Many of these criticisms can be applied to other tools as well.  In short, JCR and Web of Science are fine tools for certain subjects and their results should be combined with other analyses.